Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Muhammad523's commentslogin

This is the funniest thing ever!

I enjoyed destroying wikipedia pages, hackernew's front page, and other stuff

There's OpenCut and it does basically the same thing, have you seen it?

Yeah, I've even tested it out myself. It's rekt, barely any features and what exists hardly works. The "new" site doesn't even load.

Not something I'd expect from a repository with 85,000 stars.


Really, what could go wrong?

How was this done?

It's their internally coded easter egg. They made a small blog post about rich media in Protondrive: https://proton.me/support/play-doom-online

I started out with web development using Flet because i staunchly didn't want to learn any language that wasn't python. The experience with it was truly frustrating and i found React to be much easier

Very fun to play around with this! Thanks

The website seems to put significant weight on the fact that it allows you to create your own block. I'd just like to point out that Scratch allows you to do that as well

You can't make a block that returns a number in Scratch, let alone another block. It's really frustrating.

I also learned programming with Scratch first, at around age 11, but i soon left it for Python

In fact, a 17-year-old is clueless while a person one year older isn't

If a law is going to treat 5 year olds differently from 50 year olds then a line has to be drawn somewhere. 18 is arbitrary, but no more arbitrary than any other age you could pick.

The law could evaluate people as individuals instead of conjuring up some idiotic magic number.

The whole purpose of law is to be a uniform system of justice. At best it could offer guidelines for how to evaluate people: perhaps level of education attained, demonstrated ability to take responsibility for themselves, etc. But the evaluation under those guidelines would still have to be made by humans.

There is precedent for such a system, e.g. minors can petition to be emancipated which allows them to be treated in many regards like an adult.


> perhaps level of education attained, demonstrated ability to take responsibility for themselves, etc.

Yes, that is what I meant. Choosing some arbitrary magic number like 18 and declaring that anyone under that age is too dumb or too irresponsible to decide is about as stupid as declaring that anyone over 65 is incapable of decision making because they might have Alzheimer's.


Ok, but this doesn’t scale well. It takes a nontrivial amount of time to evaluate each person, and it would have to be done repeatedly as they age. You would need an entire government bureaucracy devoted to it. Then people will want an appeals process for when decisions don’t go their way—both parents and children.

99% of people are probably going to use the high school diploma route and not the demonstration route, so that's basically age with extra steps.

I was rushing to post this and then found out somebody had already



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: