What in the world?? Surely there must be something more than "generate a HTML page with 500 elements". Any edge cloud hosting lets you do that for free.
Please take a look at the percentage of paying Android users. It just does not compare. It's useless to count 2 billion users in third world countries who never have and never will pay anything in-app.
Kinda funny, I use my credit card for daily transactions because I know it's never declined. On the other hand, I might not have enough cash on me at all times.
I think its a valid complaint. Who wants to constantly spend overhead on maintaining what's current without clear definitions and adding uncertainty to your tooling. It's a total PITA.
Then don't? I don't think it's a valid complaint at _all_.
It's totally fine to just pick one tool (chatGPT, Claude, Gemini) and just use whatever the best default they allow you to use. You'll get 90% of the benefits and not have to think at all.
AI is new and developing at breakneck pace. You can't complain that you want to get bleeding edge without having to do research or change workflows.
That's already unrealistic for "normal" fields. It's absurd to expect for AI.
We diverge on opinions here - most peoples workflow doesn't revolve around the current distinctions between AI. Having to incorporate that into their workflow is a PITA - I understand some people live off that and thats their bread and butter. Good for them for finding their competitive advantage. For every other builder out there who builds instead of integrates the newest AI model - its a PITA.
I will, yes. If macOS supported Vulkan, then those Intel Macs would have GPU acceleration too, and thus it would be a fair fight comparing it to MPS. Apple's tech stack is so miserly and poor that they never supported the common GPGPU libraries that literally every single OEM is and was shipping.
Apple's tech is appalling. Are you saying they exercise good judgement on behalf of their users?
I see this is them following their own differentiation and integration which I'd say is good for their users. (Personally I don't care about Vulkan support for example.)
So saying their tech is "appealing" is a matter of opinion and I'd argue something a small minority of their users care about. But I don't know.
Gp is saying their primary expertise is advertising. It's hard to watch any apple announcement and not notice how utterly hyperbolic they are at touting their own achievements.
Ya sure, you can say that every company must do that, but apple are exceptional at it. Once you start noticing the unlabeled performance charts, the missing baselines, the comparing with ages old models, the disingenuous "86x" metrics, the whole show becomes cringe worthy.
