Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chinathrow's commentslogin

The amount of money spent on PR is insane.

You can export from Google Authenticator to another device just fine.

How do you export from a phone you no longer have?

I misread your comment, you're right.

Why are you so convinved that the current administration leaves, even after defeat?

Then, and only then, you might consider the third box.

Who will investigate war crimes these days against the US?

Either the American people do, fast, or they become parties to the crime, fast.

Sorry, we and our elected representatives too busy debating who the real victims of bestiality are.

They're not even hiding it any more. Look who paid for one of his sons wedding...

This was such a weird gesture. Why did they need anyone to pay for the wedding and why did it have to be someone with ties to Putin?

Can't the change the 21M?

Yes, they could change that, too.

However I expect that adding more decimal places will actually happen, but adding extra bitcoins won't.


So it broke apart by itself?

"The European Space Agency estimates that there have been more than 660 explosions, collisions, or anomalous events resulting in fragmentation. As it stands, there are currently more than 1.5 million space debris objects in Earth orbit.

It’s not clear what may have caused the Yaogan-50 (02) satellite to break apart, but it may have been a propulsion or battery failure, or it may have itself collided with another object or space debris."


That doesn’t mean anything. “Sometimes satellites hit things or have problems and blow up. Maybe it hit something and had a problem”.

Edit: Its a perfectly valid response to the question that was asked.


> It's unfeasible to expect any company to do a human review at this scale.

Oh it absolutely is. Yes it would cost money, as do other tasks a company has at hands.


Okay. Let's try to figure out how possible it is. Let's say a company closes 10m accounts daily (however based on public accounts the actual number is way more than that).

Let's say a human can review the account in about a minute. 8 working hours a day = 480m. 10000000/480 = 20,833 people to review one account per minute 8 hours a day straight.

Now take in consideration that:

* many accounts could not be reviewed in a minute;

* people do not produce 8h of uninterrupted performance;

* there are much, much more accounts to be closed daily.

And the figure quickly approaches 100,000 people online daily, meaning five times as much in human resources, so about half a million.

So, no.

It is not feasible to expect any company to do a human review at this scale.


If you can't do it propper, then don't offer it.

That's inline whit some of the goals of the people behind Project 2025 are calling for.

Can you be more specific?

> Neither he nor Sam Altman takes responsibility for those incidents.

He doesn't need to take responsibility - as CEO, he has that implicitly. And we know it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: