Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | codingjoe's commentslogin

They put radio on the Internet... ¡Tres Comas!

Maybe we need more benchmarks that involve human collaboration instead of solo task solving.

Since they have become so capable the new bottleneck is what they can't know. The stuff that's inside people's brains who work in real companies with products and processes absent from any training set.


Q: aren't models trained to message templates using JSON for tool calls. Would a model inherently struggle with a different format?

Q: is there a measurable difference compared to harnesses with tool search?


What a wonderful skill. I hate the long and verbose do strings or docs LLMs spit out. This will make a great addition to my docu agent.

And I agree, maybe I should use this for my emails too


100%, it's not like adults are immune to misinformation, social media addiction or scams. Those platforms should be safe for all people regardless of their age, nationality, sexual orientation, gender or religion.


We could just start making it illegal to advertise to children. Without age verification, it's just a burden of proof with the advertiser that their ad isn't targeting children and a ban on age specific target groups for ad platforms.


What's the advantage to stopping there?


Reading this as "why stop with ad restrictions there" rather than "why only stop ads there":

Salami-slicing, and appeal to a more appealing proposal and target group. Adverttising-to-children is inherently controversial, already banned in many countries / jurisdictions, and is a relatively easy sell. If there's going to be a reform in how advertising is perceived and regulated, it's less that this is where to stop than where to start.


Oh it's just saving me money during checkout


Do you really want to give platforms more incentives to push for age verification?


That's a valid point. Maybe better to have no ads at all.


That's a valid point. Maybe better to have no ads at all


Hm... But why not use Python


Because it's not preinstalled on every machine. Bash is a good target for portability reasons, but it's a shitty language to write in. If ever I get in the position again to have to write some bash, like for an installer or so, I'm going to be looking into Amber again.


portability but not posix shell? tsk tsk


Portability is dead now anyways. Something can have "sh" but all you can depend on are sh semantics and built ins. The whole point of a shell script is to compose a larger workflow out of the command line tools preinstalled on a system. I can't guarantee a sh script written on macOS is going to work on FreeBSD or Linux anyways, so there's zero reason to limit myself to sh.


Given that you reuse Postgres' tests and LLM have been clearly trained on Postgres' three decades of contributions, this may constitute a license violation. Unless you include the original license of course. From a human level I also understand how you ended up with a less permissive license.


License for test might be subject to debate, because afaik the project is merely running them.

but yes the test files should be presented under their original licence.


How is it different from OSMAnd?


It's a fork from Maps.me, the streamlined map app popular with normies. I myself use and love OSMAnd, but in the travel communities I am active in, most people react badly to OSMAnd as something arcane and nerdy.


Arcane and nerdy is a good description of OSMAnd. That's why I love it and would never switch to anything else.


Much better performance and much less cluttered UI, at the cost of having fewer features.


The performance advantage is small to nil, IME. The UI is admittedly cleaner, though partly (as you say) that's simply because it has a ton less features.


Interesting. When I switched from OsmAnd to Organic, the map loaded much faster as I panned it.


The difference mostly comes from the default detail levels and shape optimization. You can make it as fast in OsmAnd as both are GPU-accelerated, but OsmAnd renders the map more detailed by default.


And at the cost of map fidelity. Complex curves look terrible at certain zoom levels in CoMaps/Organic Maps.


Same in OsmAnd though. Someone recently posted a screenshot of an area they thought was badly mapped (with AI or at least not using the "make square corners" tool). Turns out to be Osmand's coordinate rounding as part of the map data compression

Comparing a building in my city between the two maps by flipping between the apps, it looks identical to me. Not a scientific test though


Better and easier to understand and use UX.


much better UI, does osmand has now colored hiking trails without downloading some extra maps?


Yes, you can toggle a setting to use the network colors. I use it mostly for hiking. The UI is a learning curve, 100%, I am curious to check another tool


Is that going into effect globally? It's hard to believe this will sit well with Japanese customers where second hand gaming markets are, dare I say it, culturally relevant.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: