Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | frabonacci's commentslogin

We've also seen similar improvements on a M5 max. no M1 pro or M3 pro results yet though - would love to see someone try those


my guess is apple chose a conservative profile for compatibility across different chips and guest releases


agreed on the title. added more context below on the exact scope and why this is really a VM capability-reporting issue: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49260087


apple silicon is what made us start Lume in the first place last year. the hardware is so good (M1 is now 6 years old!) that people keep pushing through the gaps in the platform. just yesterday we ran a fully offline computer-use agent with Cua Driver and Muse Glimmer, all locally on Apple Silicon, an now the same kind of agent can run isolated inside a macOS VM and use Apple’s GPU path too


yeah the naming is confusing. Apple family 9 isnt M9, it's a Metal GPU feature family. Apple maps family 7 to M1, family 8 to M2, family 9 to M3/M4, and family 10 to M5


RunAnywhere or Conifer?


> this won't speed up llama.cpp for everyone, just for users running it in this particular kind of Virtualization.framework VM.

correct. these figures apply to llama.cpp inside the macOS guest configuration we tested. Lume is the VM frontend we used, while Apple's Virtualization.framework provides the virtual GPU. bare-metal llama.cpp is unaffected.

> The fix here works around a problem where the VM was causing llama.cpp to select the wrong kernels.

mostly, with one nuance: llama.cpp is selecting the correct kernels for the capability answers it receives. the stock guest reports an older Apple GPU family and a 32 KB threadgroup memory limit, so llama.cpp chooses slower kernels. Our process-scoped layer reports the tested Apple 9 and 64 KB values while allowing llama.cpp to select newer paths that the paravirtual GPU successfully execute

the layer itself though works at the Metal API boundary, independently of llama.cpp. other Metal compute and graphics apps now may select newer paths from the same capability answers, although this is still preliminary and each app needs separate testing. for example, MLX-LM stayed flat in our tests

historically related limitations have been coming up across Apple Silicon VM frontends for a while e.g. Tart tracked MPS/GPU support back in 2023: - https://github.com/openai/tart/issues/501 - https://github.com/openai/tart/issues/1032

UTM also has related cases where apps detect the Apple paravirtual Metal device but falls back to software rendering: https://github.com/utmapp/UTM/issues/7671


why do use ai to write your posts ?


Why do you expect an AI engineer to manually write prose?


Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans.

Because it is not allowed here, that's why. See the guidelines.


Why do you think an AI engineer would go through the trouble lower casing everything except for proper nouns and abbreviations?


the better question is why a throwaway account is doing capitalization forensics


yeah fair point. it's always tricky to get the whole idea across within HN's title limit. tldr: we ran the same workload in the same Lume macOS VM on the same Apple Silicon host, first with stock Metal capability reporting and then with our process-scoped dynamic library. The 11.08x figure is prompt processing, while 16.36x is token generation. the mechanism technically extends to graphics workloads too but these figures are specifically from llama.cpp


i bought this for my girlfriend as an entrypoint laptop considering she is coming from Windows - and overall satisfied. the battery though could be improved especially considering for a couple of hundred bucks more we could have gotten a used macBook air


Battery issues perhaps? I haven't charged my Neo since I bought it 8 days ago. It came with a 78% battery charge and is now at 53%.


A few examples i'm excited about:

- Closing the coding feedback loop by having agents verify their own changes in a real app

- Automating repetitive workflows across apps that don't have good APIs

- Agents recording product demos of them using software. One compelling use case here: https://x.com/trycua/status/2047383207612645426

- Creating CLI and APIs for apps by reverse implementing their GUI, e.g. see: https://github.com/HKUDS/CLI-Anything


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: