Don't forget that, in my opinion very positive way, it also normalized the concept of "uniform measurements". Every instance of `rounded-md` is the same on a site.
I am not the parent but I took it as them saying the premise was wrong to begin with, which I very much agree with. Learning should not be primarily directed by job availability.
I do however like the imagery from the parent of a big collection of people working for a decade to produce one (1) drug and then burning all that infrastructure and training down and then being shocked when someone with no infrastructure or training or history in drugs comes along and somehow produces it but outsells the original.
I'm saying that most people, even most programmers, don't have the facilities or inclination to train new models man. I've done it plenty of times and I absolutely don't recommend it.
Frankly I don't think you even know what the phrase entails.
So again, you can train people but not AI? That's literally what you've said and now moving the goal posts in a way that makes no difference to what you said being patently wrong.
It's wild having to argue with people who say demonstrably untrue things and then refuse to admit that what they said was wrong.
things like the ones I had enumerated in my first comment. I'm old enough to remember FUD about all of those and many others, and perceptive enough to identify many ongoing public opinion campaigns as such.
> is like a junior with knowledge across the board, that you really need to guide, versus a senior that thinks with you on architecture
I don't want to be rude, but your linkedin has a sumtotal (generous) of like 8 months of programming as a profession (job title is AI Engineer). The rest is at best programming adjacent. How would you know what either of these situations are really like?
I haven't logged in to LinkedIn or looked at it since a former employer demanded that everyone create a profile. So mine is now about 20 years out of date.
Hasan Piker's political project polls extremely high (universal healthcare, abortion access, and more), so actually you could understand American voter politics by reading Hasan's comments amusingly enough.
They retain ownership over that code because you signed a contract saying explicitly that. Did you sign the same thing with Anthropic? Did your company?
Anthropic isn't a party to such contract either because they (most likely, in the reasonable reading of relevant laws) hold no copyright over the output of their LLM.
reply