"Use Ctrl-R for fuzzy history, or Ctrl-P/Ctrl-N for history entries"
(I have those bound to bindkey '^P' up-history and bindkey '^N' down-history instead of up and down arrow's "up-line-or-history" which is really annoying with multiline commands)
Eh, there’s a tension there, becuase on the other hand as more renewable power is added to the grid, you’d expect divergence. Especially in countries which are letting people buy at spot price; that can be horribly expensive, or go _negative_.
I'd imagine most electric car batteries aren't fully charging and discharging every day. That makes quite a bit of difference in wear!
Tons of EVs these days are being made with what, 200-300mi range of battery pack with some internal buffer as well so they're never really going 0-100%? So what, we'll be generous here about the 20-80% and think 160mi of range used every day. That's 58,400mi of driving per car! The average US car does closer to 14,000mi. Being generous, that's 4x the wear cycles of a normal US automobile.
Isn't it today/wouldn't it be in the close future relatively trivial to port most of the already formalized results between languages with help of LLMs?
The article explicitly calls out selection bias (this is entirely based on 90% that opted into using the tutor, there was no control group), I wish the headline did as well. "Engaged students score 0.71 - 1.30 SD better in tests" sounds like a much simpler explanation.
I used to TA a graduate level CS math class at Georgia Tech. We regularly saw that the students who self-organized study groups did dramatically better in the course than average. One semester they told us to put everyone in study groups to see if it helped. The effect disappeared. Turns out that it was the self-selection of the most engaged students into a small group that mattered, not the study group itself.
If it's purely a correlation, then maybe those students would be more successful than average even without the study group. They're already the most motivated kids. Maybe they just do "motivated kid stuff" and would still outperform.
Yes, that’s what I think at this point. There is no effect of the study group except as a support group. (That’s all it was for me when I was a student and joined the self-organized study group.)
My self-organized study group was quite a mix of characters, and while I don't doubt that a couple of my friends's grades did benefit from having me there to help them out, I do definitely think that most of the stuff I remember learning there was outside the boundaries of what any of our parents would have approved :)
Same. Plenty of perfectly valid reasons to outright ban generated PRs, but "Look, I asked ChatGPT to generate a PR which would break SDL, and it did not bother reading AGENTS.md" is a pretty weak take - gotta know thy enemy a little bit better than that.
It's not the argument the maintainer gives. I unironically suggest at least use AI to summarize that thread if you don't bother reading it before commenting.
It's always easier to blame the model and convince yourself that you have some sort of talent in reviewing LLM's work that others don't.
In my experience the differences are mostly in how the code produced by LLM is prompted and what context is given to the agent. Developers who have experience delegating their work are more likely to prevent downstream problems from happening immediately and complain their colleagues cannot prompt as efficiently without a lot of hand holding. And those who rarely or never delegated their work are invariably going to miss crucial context details and rate the output they get lower.
Have owned a couple iPads starting ~2010 -- mainly for reading pdfs, and comics in electronic form. Occasionally drawing / jamming some tunes - almost all via 3rd party apps. There are still plenty of decent apps in the ecosystem, even though their eventual obsolescence is as good as built in, and a lot of stuff I previously loved the platform for has now been gone for years with no replacement. Native apps have never been great at pretty much anything, with a notable exception of Garage Band which is an absolute banger for its money. Books is... passable I guess?
But the reading pdfs part is important -- and really hard to beat for me, the iOS drag/scroll/pinch/zoom UX perceived responsiveness is still unmatched IMO. It would take some real creativity beyond liquid glass to enshittify this aspect out.
I find the last part really surprising. That seems, and feels (I do have an iPad), standard to me. But markup is, to put it lightly, fucking terrible.
I lean towards the iPad's success mostly being brand name and advertising because I've never experienced the "just works". I understand that from the non techie people, but not when talking to nerds
reply