Presumably you realize most current Microsoft employees were not even alive when the EEE memo was written.
Must we also talk about some decision Henry Ford made in 1906 every time the automaker is mentioned, or something the Gauls did in 200 BC every time England is mentioned?
You don't want to talk about it because either 1) you don't know it, or 2) you were downplaying it at the time, too.
The only time we talk about Henry Ford, unless it's about his anti-Semitism, is about decisions he made in 1906. If we go by your arbitrary standard, why would we talk about Henry Ford at all when we could talk about this year's Tesla model?
> See also Netscape v2.0 and 3.0, which were badass browsers back in 1996, but are similarly irrelevant today.
Why are you talking about Netscape? What does that have to do with anything happening right now?
So, maybe it's a huge conspiracy, or, alternatively, maybe it's a case of a person who attempted to reverse engineer the HN ranking algorithm missing a couple terms in the equation.
Everyone can apply their own form of Occam's Razor. Some will conclude conspiracy, others, missed second and third order terms.
Create of Quality New here. You are probably right here. The raw ranking formula is right, but I am lumping in the additional adjustments from the flamewar filter, etc. with "penalties." I will clarify that.
(Microsoft) GitHub Copilot already builds a semantic index of your solution in a cloud cache, which is used to give higher code intelligence than what you can get from Claude Code alone or LLM interfaces which don't have native support for the Roslyn API like GitHub Copilot does.
GitHub Copilot's semantic index can work for any SaaS repo provider (GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.) or any local repos but this requires you to opt into the feature. Repos hosted in GitHub and Azure DevOps do NOT require opting into it since Microsoft already has your code.
Exactly! I'd be more than happy to hand it over to Microsoft to continue maintaining it just to be clear. But MIT licensing it, hopefully the community will help keep it up to date with future C# versions too.
I'm hoping Rider get some support for switching between worktrees efficiently - until then, it becomes a tool only the primary / interactive agent sessions can access.
lol I actually didn't know that. This is MIT licensed though.
EDIT: I think the differentiation is that this isn't MCP based. Dumping a portable json file allows much more flexibility than just having to run Rider IDE in the background with the solution loaded and indexed. e.g. the graph works with jq, CI (gates), arbitrary agents without MCP support, non MCP tools, bulk questions etc.
You presume wrong. No college professor will waste the amount of time required to fully write out everything they will say in class in advance. Notes, yes. Detailed notes, not unlikely. Full script to be read verbatim, nope.
reply