Yeah, it looks that way but where is the substance?
Why doesn't he openly discuss the pros and cons of both sides to finally reach a conclusion?
"But the dangers are real." is not a rational balancing of reasons. It is just a paranoid statement.
Yeah, it looks that way but where is the substance?
Why doesn't he openly discuss the pros and cons of both sides to finally reach a conclusion?
"But the dangers are real." is not a rational balancing of reasons. It is just a paranoid statement.