after "Safe-Harbor"and it's successor "EU-US Privacy-Shield" I suggest..
the "Trust-PACT"
P - privacy
A - acknowledged
C - confidentiality
T - treaty
It's not only an insult of EU data protection laws and the EU basic rights charta.
Not only are the big US cloud providers evading taxes and stiffling competition in the EU, they are also instrumental to US hegemonial ambitions.
All your data (and taxes) belongs to us. That's whats going on.
I wonder how long the standard contractual clauses will hold, I don't see how they are doing better.
This judgement also validated SCC. Basically they are ok because they are underpinned by "the receiver country need to have proper privacy protections".
So the SCC is legit. You just can't use it with the US.
the "Trust-PACT"
P - privacy A - acknowledged C - confidentiality T - treaty
It's not only an insult of EU data protection laws and the EU basic rights charta.
Not only are the big US cloud providers evading taxes and stiffling competition in the EU, they are also instrumental to US hegemonial ambitions. All your data (and taxes) belongs to us. That's whats going on.
I wonder how long the standard contractual clauses will hold, I don't see how they are doing better.