Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, only if you want an appreciable number of people to use it.


There will never be an appreciable number of people writing the kind of software that justifies the use of Ada. If your project needs it, the cost isn't a concern.


Ada is a general-purpose programming language with an emphasis on safety and contract-oriented programming. There's a lot of software written in e.g. C++ today where Ada would be perfectly justified, if only it was more widespread and accessible.

Here's one unusual example, a BSD package manager written in Ada: https://github.com/jrmarino/synth


You definitely could write a lot more in Ada. The world would be a lot better off for it. Unfortunately, with the way things are going right now, I don't think it will happen. It takes a lot of active convincing to keep people from writing absolutely everything in JavaScript, so I don't think we'll be able to get to a point where Ada's ecosystem will be built out enough for it to be a common general-purpose language.


There are enough to keep 7 companies alive selling their compilers.


Like Windows, Mac, Oracle, z/OS, Photoshop or IDA Pro?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: