Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As the editor of the piece, I'll completely agree with your assessment. Free speech rights are more important than property rights. The founders thought so too. But the implication that property rights don't matter at all to Wired because free speech rights are more important than them is logically flawed.


Does the article state any concern about property rights?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: