Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But I don't know that from the proposed re-titling of the article. The importance of the conjecture is more salient for the general reader than the (uninformative) names of the people who conjectured in the first place.


It's loosely explained deep down in the article.


...which is not the HN title, so parent's point still stands




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: