Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Though as far as I'm aware there's no inherent reason for this - apart from cost.

One of the things which has made PC so awesome since the early 90's has been the vast array of hardware available - you can just plug something out, plug something else in and boom, it runs faster, better and it's easy. You don't have to wait 12 months for a "new version of The PC". It's an open platform, we all love open platforms, don't we?



> Though as far as I'm aware there's no inherent reason for this - apart from cost.

Cost and size. The bread-and-butter market for ARM is consumer electronic devices, where size really matters. Other chip packaging that's easier for hobbyists to work with would be a huge waste of space by comparison.

There are some ARM chips available in DIP packages, but I suspect that selection will always be relatively limited, since demand will always be relatively limited.


The ARM chips available in DIP packages are microcontrollers that you are more likely to see in a toy or gadget than a general purpose or multimedia computer. In embedded systems where they are used, you probably can't swap them out for another part anyway because of code changes needed, different pinouts, etc.


When was the last time you upgraded a CPU on a laptop? Laptops already outsell desktops, and by 2015, tablets will outsell desktops.

http://www.inquisitr.com/76157/tablets-to-overtake-desktop-s...

I can't see why Intel would continue to worry about an increasingly shrinking part of the industry.


The difference now is that consumers aren't driving PC sales -- Enterprises are. Consumers are buying tablets.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: