Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Whilst I appreciate the commitment to their values, I wonder where they stand on the 'safety' of their users as it relates to the Android Developer Verification update (currently top of HN, here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755965).

"Security" vs Openness

> “make things so secure that we ourselves can’t break them, whether the device costs $1000 or $100, or the user is a celebrity or a refugee“

That can mean different things to different people in different contexts. Could easily mean building a software platform with security features that banks will build their apps to require.



> I wonder where they stand on the 'safety' of their users as it relates to the Android Developer Verification update

He discussed this briefly in a talk he gave at the Grazer Linuxtage 2026 in April https://media.ccc.de/v/glt26-615-what-can-we-learn-from-andr... at around minute 46


That is wasn't even covered says enough for me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: