Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

(Former Oxide)

An in-house team is most likely competing with something like Dell or VMware, not really Oxide. A significant part of Oxide’s value proposition is that you’re buying hardware and software purpose built for each other. Unless you’re also going to go so far as to do all of that, which companies like Google do, of course, it’s not really the same thing.

This matters when your various vendors start pointing at each other when something goes wrong. Oxide is truly “one throat to choke” in a way others just aren’t, and stand by that quality.

(Not to mention other various efficiencies, like power, or removing things like the BIOS and BMC junk that’s in basically every other server you buy right now. And the ability to send attenuation from boot up through the host OS. Just tons of things they’re differentiated on that your in house team just isn’t going to do.)



The more I read responses on here, the more I realize how much marketing work oxide needs to do even for the HN segment, which is very bizarre to me.

For me, Oxide is one of the most interesting things I've seen in the computing market in a long time.


Hacker News has a wide variety of people in it, but certainly leans more toward software expertise.


"attestation" not "attenuation," thank you autocorrect :/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: