So we basically have Anonymous or lulz-sec working on your proposed model. You think wikileaks made less noise and effect than Anonymous?
Jacob's talk was a pretty good one for an attention whore and that's what keynote speeches are supposed to be about.
1) You can't use Anonymous as a subject for the verb "working" because it's not a noun - it's an adjective, and it's capitalized out of convention, not because it's a name.
2) Those calling themselves anonymous are still operating. Wikileaks is basically paralyzed (which is unfortunate).
1) Just thought that in the context in lulzsec and wikileaks it was self evident that I'm not talking about the adjective.
2) Wikileaks without a face would not have been possible. When there's somebody prosecuted as viciously as Assange was people understand that something is at stake here.
3) What's that?
4) What about the Arab spring? I think it's a bit out of context in here. Just like Occupy movements.
