I'd say you're wrong. Google hosts user-created content that could (and likely did) contain malware at, for example, sites.google.com: http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://si...

For php.net, it reports only mere 4 trojans. So php.net is almost 100 times safer that google.com, according to this tool. That sounds pretty good :)

> For php.net, it reports only mere 4 trojans. So php.net is almost 100 times safer that google.com, according to this tool. That sounds pretty good :)

Compare how many google.com pages have been tested and how much php.net pages have been tested and stop with that non sense.

You are confident enough in Google's ability to have perfect security on all pages that you think the tool is broken when it says that is not true?

That query probably contains all subpages in google.com, which I imagine have been exploited in some fashion. Google isn't perfect.